Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is better than Google Pixel 4, getting a 90.8 score against 81.9. Even though the Galaxy Note 20 is newer than Google Pixel 4, it's heavier and just a little bit thicker. Google Pixel 4 has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better performance than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 features a superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 2800mAh. The Galaxy Note 20 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a camera with a worse 12 megapixels resolution and a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 4. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Google Pixel 4, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.