Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has a global score of 90.8, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4a 5G's score of 87.5. Despite being the best in this comparison, it must be told that it is also somewhat heavier and a little thicker. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little more vivid display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display. Google Pixel 4a 5G features as much memory to install games and applications as the Galaxy Note 20, they have the same internal storage.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a back facing camera with a lower resolution and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better video definition and a much larger sensor. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 4a 5G. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 4a 5G, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.