Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | -- |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.84 ounces | -- |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), getting a global score of 90.8 against 82.2. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a much powerful processor than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a better display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a way higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a camera with a way worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a much better video resolution. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a very superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.