Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | -- |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black and Epi Green |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LTPO |
| 393 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is better than the Honor Magic 6 Pro, with a 90.8 score against 76.6. The Galaxy Note 20 is a lighter and just a little bit thinner device than Honor Magic 6 Pro. The Honor Magic 6 Pro features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has more RAM.
Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1280 x 2800px, a little bigger display and a bit better quantity of pixels per inch of screen. Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
Honor Magic 6 Pro has a superior camera than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has a much bigger back camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality, a lot larger aperture to take better photos and video in low light situations, better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a much better 50 megapixels resolution camera.
Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.