Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| 2020-08-21 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is better than the HTC U Ultra, getting a overall score of 90.8 against 77. The Galaxy Note 20 construction is much newer than HTC U Ultra's, although it's just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a little better processing power than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The HTC U Ultra features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher count of pixels per display inch. The HTC U Ultra features much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a 12 mega pixels camera in the back and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a much better video resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos.
Galaxy Note 20 has a much better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 43% larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 is more expensive than the HTC U Ultra, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.