Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| 2020-08-21 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is better than HTC U11, getting a global score of 90.8 against 77.6. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 design is extremely newer, but just a little thicker and heavier than HTC U11. HTC U11 has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels amount per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Galaxy Note 20 features a slightly better storage capacity for apps and games than HTC U11, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a little better processing power than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 features a slightly better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures or video in low light environments, and they both have a back camera with a 12 megapixels resolution, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a lot better video definition and a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Galaxy Note 20 features a much longer battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC U11. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get HTC U11, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.