Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than the LG G7 Fit's score of 77. Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is newer than LG G7 Fit, it is a bit thicker and heavier. The LG G7 Fit has a better display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
LG G7 Fit counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note 20 features a little better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit better camera than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega pixels, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor capturing way higher quality videos and pictures, a bigger diafragm aperture and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a superior battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.