Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than LG K52's score of 76. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a a bit heavier cellphone than LG K52, but both are equally thin. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit more powerful processor than LG K52, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a more vivid screen than LG K52, because it has a higher pixel density, a little bit larger display and a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a slightly better camera than LG K52, because although it has a way less mega-pixels back camera, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a lot better video resolution and a larger back-facing camera sensor.
The LG K52 features a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note 20 has just a bit better battery life than LG K52, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.