Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Sky Blue and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than LG K62's 78.2 overall score. The Galaxy Note 20 is a just a bit heavier phone than the LG K62, but both of them have the same thickness. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a much better display than LG K62, because it has a greater display pixels density, a lot higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little larger display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a little faster processor than LG K62, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a slightly better camera than LG K62, because although it has a way less mega-pixels back camera, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a bigger sensor and a way better video definition.
The LG K62 has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG K62 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note 20 has just a bit longer battery performance than LG K62, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.