Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Mirror black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is better than the LG Q70, getting a 90.8 score against 77.9. The Galaxy Note 20 body is just a bit lighter but just a little thicker than LG Q70, and they were only released 4 months apart. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better looking display than LG Q70, because although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit better processor than LG Q70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has 4 GB more RAM. LG Q70 features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG Q70 and Galaxy Note 20 feature quite similar cameras, because although the LG Q70 has a much tinier sensor, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same (4K) video definition, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much better 32 MP resolution and faster 30 fps video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little longer battery lifetime than LG Q70, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Q70. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note 20, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the LG Q70, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.