Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Holographic white |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the LG Stylo 6, getting a global score of 90.8 against 76.7. The Galaxy Note 20 is a a little bit thinner and lighter device than LG Stylo 6, even though they were released with only a couple months difference. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little better performance than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM memory.
LG Stylo 6 features a screen that is just as good as the Galaxy Note 20 one, although the LG Stylo 6 also has a bit more pixels per screen inch, a little bit higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a bit larger screen. LG Stylo 6 features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a superior camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a lower 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a way larger sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and videos and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than LG Stylo 6, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Stylo 6. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note 20, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG Stylo 6, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.