Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the LG V10's overall score of 78.6. Even though Galaxy Note 20 is a bit heavier than the LG V10, it's just a bit thinner and noticeably newer. The LG V10 features a much better display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a higher count of pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with a faster CPU than LG V10, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores. LG V10 features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Note 20 has a superior battery life than LG V10, because it has a 43 percent more battery size. LG V10's camera is just as good as the camera in Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although the LG V10 has a lot tinier sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera and faster video frame rate.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V10. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get LG V10, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.