Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is better than LG V30S ThinQ, with a 90.8 score against 82.5. The Galaxy Note 20 body is extremely newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than LG V30S ThinQ. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a little better hardware performance than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM memory.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2880px resolution. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has superior battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 takes clearer pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and a much less mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor capturing much better quality photos and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy Note 20 is a little more expensive than the LG V30S ThinQ, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.