Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is much better than LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 general score. Galaxy Note 20's body is newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than the LG V35 ThinQ. Galaxy Note 20 features a bit better hardware performance than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Note 20 takes a little bit better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a way lower resolution camera in the back and a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much better video resolution and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. The Galaxy Note 20 has better battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V35 ThinQ, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.