Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the LG V40 ThinQ, with a overall score of 90.8 against 81.2. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 design is newer, but somewhat heavier and a little thicker than the LG V40 ThinQ. The LG V40 ThinQ features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a better amount of pixels per inch of screen.
LG V40 ThinQ has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit better CPU than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 has greater battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 30% more battery capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a bit better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have a 12 MP resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a way larger sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V40 ThinQ. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG V40 ThinQ, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.