Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is a little bit better than LG V60 ThinQ's general score of 87.6. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 design is lighter and just a bit thinner than the LG V60 ThinQ, even though both of them were only released with a couple months difference. LG V60 ThinQ features a screen that is just as good as the Galaxy Note 20 one, although the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460, a little more pixels per inch of display and a bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy Note 20 features a bit faster processing unit than LG V60 ThinQ. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 8 GB RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 shoots a bit better photos and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a worse video resolution, a smaller sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality and a back camera with way less MP resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
LG V60 ThinQ has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16 percent more battery size.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V60 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V60 ThinQ, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.