Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is just a bit better than the LG Velvet, with a 90.8 score against 87.1. Even being the best device in this review, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is an a bit thicker and a bit heavier device than the LG Velvet. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit better processor than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG Velvet has a screen that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 one, although the LG Velvet also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460px, a little bit bigger screen and a bit greater pixels number per inch in the display. The LG Velvet features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a smaller sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have the same video resolution and the same aperture, the LG Velvet also counts with higher video frame rate and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
LG Velvet features much more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet's battery performance is very similar to Samsung Galaxy Note 20's battery duration.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG Velvet, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Velvet. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note 20, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG Velvet, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.