Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2024-06-20 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is better than Motorola Edge (2024), having a global score of 90.8 against 78.5. Despite being the best in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 body is incredibly older, somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Motorola Edge (2024). Galaxy Note 20 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge (2024). They have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola Edge (2024) has a sharper screen than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge (2024) also counts with a just a little higher amount of pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy Note 20 captures slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has a back-facing camera with way less megapixels and a tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Motorola Edge (2024) has much more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 20, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge (2024) counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 costs a lot more money than the Motorola Edge (2024), but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.