Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Surfing blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a bit better than Moto G 5G Plus, with a general score of 90.8 against 82.6. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a just a little thinner and just a bit lighter cellphone than Moto G 5G Plus, even though they were only released with a couple months difference. The Galaxy Note 20 has just a bit better performance than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Moto G 5G Plus counts with a screen that is just as good as the Galaxy Note 20 one, and although the Moto G 5G Plus has a little bit more pixels per inch of display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2520px, they both have a screen of the same size. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Moto G 5G Plus captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with higher 30 frames per second video frame rates, a larger camera aperture to take better low light photography and a lot higher resolution camera.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.