Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2023-06-02 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is better than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), having a score of 90.8 against 76. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is an extremely older phone than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), but Samsung managed to build it just a little lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. Galaxy Note 20 has a much greater processing power than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a bit worse number of pixels per inch of display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a little bit larger display. Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features better battery duration than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh. Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures and video and a much smaller sensor providing a lot lower image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a much better 50 MP resolution back-facing camera and better 30 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.