Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, getting a general score of 90.8 against 86.2. Galaxy Note 20's design is a bit lighter and a little thinner than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, although it was released only 15 months before. The Moto G200 5G and Samsung Galaxy Note 20 both count with incredibly similar processors, both have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Moto G200 5G and Samsung Galaxy Note 20 feature quite similar screens, although the Moto G200 5G also has a little bit better display pixels density, a slightly better 1080 x 2460 resolution and a bit larger screen. The Moto G200 5G counts with as much storage to store more apps and games as Galaxy Note 20, they have exactly the same internal memory capacity.
Motorola Moto G200 5G features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Moto G200 5G has a superior camera than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with better 30 fps video frame rates and a way more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.