Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-12-20 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the Moto G51 5G, having a 90.8 score against 77.8. Although the Galaxy Note 20 is older than the Moto G51 5G, it's design is a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better display than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a just a little better pixels amount in each inch of display. Moto G51 5G captures slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto G51 5G also has higher video frame rates and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Moto G51 5G has a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G51 5G features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.