Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | -- |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than Motorola Moto G60s's overall score of 79.9. The Galaxy Note 20 is a just a bit lighter and thinner cellphone than Motorola Moto G60s. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto G60s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better display than Motorola Moto G60s, although it has a just a bit lower quantity of pixels per display inch, a quite lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a quite smaller display. Motorola Moto G60s counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Moto G60s counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G60s also has faster video frame rate, a back camera with a way higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture. Motorola Moto G60s has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.