Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-08-21 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than the Moto Z Force's general score of 75.8. Even though Galaxy Note 20 is newer than the Moto Z Force, it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Motorola Moto Z Force has a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because it has 4 more CPU cores and more RAM. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Note 20 shoots clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a back facing camera with much less MP resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition. The Galaxy Note 20 features better battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z Force. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Moto Z Force, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.