Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than the Motorola Moto Z3's 77.6 score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 construction is newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than Motorola Moto Z3. Motorola Moto Z3 features a screen that's very similar to the display in Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although the Motorola Moto Z3 has a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Moto Z3 has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note 20 has a bit superior CPU than Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a superior camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos and a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in low light environments.
Galaxy Note 20 has a very superior battery life than Moto Z3, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto Z3. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note 20, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Motorola Moto Z3, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.