Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Moto Z3 Play, getting a 90.8 score against 76.3. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 body is incredibly newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than Moto Z3 Play. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a bit better CPU than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little more vivid screen than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a quite worse pixels quantity per inch of screen, it also counts with a little larger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a superior storage for applications and games than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a superior battery lifetime than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 features a superior camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photographs or video in low light situations, and they both have a camera with a 12 mega pixels, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 costs a lot more money than the Moto Z3 Play, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.