Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LTPS |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is better than the Motorola One 5G Ace's 81.6 global score. Even when the Galaxy Note 20 and the Motorola One 5G Ace were only released with a couple months difference, the Galaxy Note 20 is somewhat thinner and just a little lighter. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit better screen than Motorola One 5G Ace. Both have a same size screen, the same pixel density and exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a little bit better performance than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola One 5G Ace captures just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a bigger aperture, better 30 frames per second video frame rate and a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution.
Motorola One 5G Ace features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16 percent more battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One 5G Ace. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note 20, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Motorola One 5G Ace, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.