Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than the Motorola One Action's global score of 78.5. The Galaxy Note 20 body is newer and a little thinner than the Motorola One Action's, although it's a little heavier. Motorola One Action counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher screen pixels density and a slightly better 1080 x 2520px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM. The Motorola One Action features a much better storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Action also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 has superior battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 3500mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 captures much better photos and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a 12 mega pixels resolution camera and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a much higher video definition.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Action. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola One Action, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.