Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is better than the Motorola One Hyper, with a 90.8 score against 79.8. The Galaxy Note 20 is a just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner phone than the Motorola One Hyper, although both of them were released only a couple of months apart. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit bigger display.
The Galaxy Note 20 has a bit better CPU than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM. Motorola One Hyper features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with higher video frame rate and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a bit longer battery life than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One Hyper. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note 20, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola One Hyper, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.