Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is better than the Motorola One Vision, having a 90.8 score against 80.7. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is just a little heavier than Motorola One Vision, it's just a little thinner and also newer. The Motorola One Vision counts with just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520px and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy Note 20 features a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola One Vision features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Vision also has an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 has superior battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 23 percent greater battery capacity. Motorola One Vision captures clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution, higher 30 frames per second video frame rates and a larger aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.