Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is slightly better than Motorola razr (2020), having a general score of 90.8 against 87. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, Galaxy Note 20's design is a little thicker and a bit heavier than Motorola razr (2020). The Galaxy Note 20 has a bit sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a bit larger display and a just a bit higher count of pixels in each inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a bit better performance than Motorola razr (2020). They have 8 cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. The Motorola razr (2020) features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Note 20 has a way better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a much more mega-pixels back facing camera, a bigger aperture and faster 30 frames per second video frame rate.
The Galaxy Note 20 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.