Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Nokia 9 PureView, having a 90.8 score against 76.4. The Galaxy Note 20 is a newer phone than Nokia 9 PureView, but it's a bit thicker and heavier. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
The Nokia 9 PureView has as much memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Samsung Galaxy Note 20, both of them have the same 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 captures much better photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same resolution camera and the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a lot bigger back camera sensor and a way better 7680x4320 video quality. Galaxy Note 20 has better battery performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 3320mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 costs a lot more than Nokia 9 PureView, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.