Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having a 90.8 score against 75.8. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a newer device, and it's also just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S. The nubia Red Magic 3S features just a little better performance than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 and the nubia Red Magic 3S count with quite similar screens, and although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit lower screen pixels density and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, they both have a same size display. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a better camera than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller back camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and video in low light environments and a much better resolution back camera.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3S has improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16% larger battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 is a lot more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.