Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's overall score of 83.1. Even though the Galaxy Note 20 and OPPO Find X2 Pro were released only a couple of months apart, the Galaxy Note 20 is a bit thinner and a little bit lighter. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much better screen than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher count of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a very superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 512 GB internal storage. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a processing unit that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 one, and although the OPPO Find X2 Pro has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
OPPO Find X2 Pro's battery duration is just as good as the battery life in Samsung Galaxy Note 20, although the OPPO Find X2 Pro has just 4260mAh of battery size against 4300mAh. The OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a lot more MP back-facing camera, a larger camera aperture for better low light photos, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a way larger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.