Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a global score of 90.8, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's score of 77.4. Galaxy Note 20's body has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, but it is just a bit lighter. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy A15 5G counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little higher number of pixels per display inch. Galaxy Note 20 takes clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a back facing camera with much less mega pixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Note 20, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.