Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | -- |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is better than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, getting a 90.8 score against 76.2. The Galaxy Note 20 body is a bit lighter but just a little bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. The Galaxy A16 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit lower display density, they both have a display with the same size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has 4 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a back facing camera with a way worse resolution, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
Galaxy A16 5G has a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A16 5G also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A16 5G. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A16 5G, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.