Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A22 5G's 84.6 score. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is an older device than the Galaxy A22 5G, but Samsung managed to make it just a little thinner and a bit lighter anyway. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a screen that is very similar to Galaxy Note 20's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density. The Galaxy A22 5G has much more memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB.
Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a camera in the back with way less mega-pixels, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a way better video quality. Galaxy A22 5G features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.