Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, having a overall score of 90.8 against 79.9. Galaxy Note 20's body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, but it's a bit lighter. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite better display pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a much better performing processor than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A25 5G features greater battery duration than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy A25 5G has a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a much smaller camera sensor providing a way lower image quality, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with faster 30 fps video frame rate and a much more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.