Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is better than Galaxy A31, with a 90.8 score against 81.3. Galaxy Note 20's construction is just a bit thinner but a little heavier than the Galaxy A31, and both of them were only released 4 months apart. Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A31 features a display that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy Note 20's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy A31 has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel number per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A31 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing photos and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A31 also counts with faster video frame rates and a camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A31 counts with better battery performance than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.