Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a global score of 90.8, which is better than the Galaxy A35 5G's global score of 79.4. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is notably older and a bit thicker than Galaxy A35 5G, it's body is still just a little lighter. Galaxy A35 5G features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Note 20, although it has a little bit lower pixels density, a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Galaxy A35 5G and Galaxy Note 20 feature very similar memory capacity to store more apps and games, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Note 20 has a much powerful processor than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM.
Galaxy A35 5G has a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a tinier sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with faster video frame rate and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.