Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-08-21 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is better than Samsung Galaxy C5's global score of 76.4. The Galaxy Note 20 body is a lot newer, but much heavier and thicker than the Samsung Galaxy C5. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a superior hardware performance than Galaxy C5, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy C5, because although it has a just a little worse quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy C5, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a very superior battery life than Galaxy C5, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity. Galaxy Note 20 features a much better camera than Galaxy C5, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light photos and video and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.