Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is a little bit better than Galaxy F41's global score of 85.2. The Galaxy Note 20 construction is just a little bit thinner but a little bit heavier than Galaxy F41, and they were only released with a few months difference. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy F41, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy F41 counts with a bit better display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater screen density. Galaxy F41 has a much better camera than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy F41 also has higher video frame rates, a camera with way more mega pixels and a larger sensor.
The Galaxy F41 has a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy F41 features a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.