Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is slightly better than Galaxy S10e's 86.3 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a newer phone than Galaxy S10e, but it is a bit thicker and extremely heavier. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10e has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater number of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy S10e has much more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S10e also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4300mAh battery size. The Galaxy Note 20 has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, and they both have the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a much better video resolution and a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy S10e, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S10e. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Galaxy S10e, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.