Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Note 20's 90.8 score. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison review, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a just a little thicker and heavier cellphone than Galaxy Note 20. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better display than Galaxy Note 20, because it has more pixels per display inch, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a little bit bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 and Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G count with very similar processing units, and although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 4 GB more RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way better camera than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same aperture, the same 24 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is more expensive than Galaxy Note 20, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.