Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, getting a global score of 93.4 against 90.8. The Galaxy S22 is a newer cellphone, and it is also lighter and a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy Note 20. Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S22. They have the same RAM amount and 8 processing cores.
Galaxy S22 counts with an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixels number in each screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 and the Galaxy S22 have very similar memory capacity to install applications and games, both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S22, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same video resolution and the same 24 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution and a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy S22 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.