Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Z Flip 3's score of 85.6. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison, we must tell that it's also older, just a little bit heavier and thicker. The Galaxy Note 20 has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a quite higher pixel count per screen inch. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both have the same aperture and a same resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features as much memory capacity for games and applications as Samsung Galaxy Note 20, both have the same internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 features superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Galaxy Note 20 and the Galaxy Z Flip 3 cost exactly the same, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.