Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is slightly better than Galaxy Note 20, with a 94.6 score against 90.8. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Galaxy Note 20 were released with only 1 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is a lot heavier but somewhat thinner. Galaxy Note 20 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 have really similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit larger display and a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit faster processor than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, a back-facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution and a 0.57 inches back camera sensor, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a much higher video resolution.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because it has more internal storage. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy Note 20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy Note 20. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy Note 20, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.