Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's overall score of 90.6. Galaxy Note 20 is an older and notably thicker cellphone than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, but Samsung managed to build it much lighter anyway. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a processor that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 one, and although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.