Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Xperia Z4v, getting a 90.8 score against 78.8. Although the Galaxy Note 20 is somewhat heavier than the Xperia Z4v, it's a little bit thinner and much newer. Galaxy Note 20 features just a little better processing power than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with more RAM.
The Xperia Z4v features a much better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a better amount of pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy Note 20 has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 captures clearer videos and photos than Xperia Z4v, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a larger diafragm aperture and a much bigger sensor taking much better quality pictures.
Galaxy Note 20 features a really longer battery performance than Xperia Z4v, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Sony Xperia Z4v, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Sony Xperia Z4v. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Note 20, else you can save some money and buy the Sony Xperia Z4v, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.