Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, getting a 90.8 score against 78.1. Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better phone than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, it must be noted that it's also an older, just a bit heavier and just a little thicker phone. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra and Galaxy Note 20 feature really similar displays, they have the same display pixels density, exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution and a same size screen.
The Galaxy Note 20 has a bit more powerful processing unit than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra. Both have 8 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's memory capacity for games and applications is just as good as Samsung Galaxy Note 20's one, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has higher video frame rates, a bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations and a lot more mega-pixels camera.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 7 percent more battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 costs more money than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.